25 Jun 2023

Fuel Dispatching - Finding the best time to schedule mining haul trucks to fuel

"Know how to solve every problem that has been solved." - R. Feynman (1988)



Programming Language: Python [Link App]


Content

1. Problem statement
2. Literature Review
    2.1. Machine learning predicting fuel consumption review
    2.2. Fuel dispatching review
3. Methodology
    3.1. Data Collection
    3.2. Machine Learning
    3.3. Optimization
4. Results
    4.1. Machine Learning
    4.2. Optimization
5. Future work
6. Code source


1. Problem statement

Mining Engineers, and this is my kindly opinion, have learned about solving the Ultimate Pit Limit Problems by easy examples, i.e., Lerchs-Grossman 2D Algorithm. However, that is not what we see when running an open-pit mining operation. Software programs have solved most of the current problems, including this, and some mining engineers become users rather than doers. That being said, I decided to code the solution to the ultimate pit limit problem by applying the Pseudoflow algorithm (Hochbaum, 2008 [^1^]).

Given a 3D block model, how do we find the economic envelope/volume that contains the maximum value and fits within our operational constraints? i.e., maximum slope angles?


2. Literature Review


2.1. Machine learning predicting fuel consumption review

  • Author: Dindarloo and S. (2015)
    • Algorithm: ANN
    • Features: Payload, Cycle status
    • Metric: MAPE
    • Perf.: 10%
  • Author: Dindarloo and S. (2016)
    • Algorithm: PLSR
    • Features: Cycle status
    • Metric: MAPE
    • Perf.: 6%
  • Author: Wang et al. (2021)
    • Algorithm: XGBoost
    • Features: Distance, Time, Uphill distance
    • Metric: MAPE
    • Perf.: 8.8%
  • Author: Soofastaei (2022)
    • Algorithm: ANN
    • Features: Payload, Resistance, Speed
    • Metric: R^2
    • Perf.: 90%

2.2. Fuel dispatching review

  • Approach: Caceres and Well (2017)
    • Features:
      • Automated fuel dispatching
      • Better filling volumes
      • Lower queues and person-hours
    • Lacking:
      • Math formulation
  • Approach: Modular Mining Systems (2019)
    • Features:
      • Set minimum fuel level
      • Assign manually
    • Lacking:
      • Trial and error approaches
      • Needs customization
      • No benefits and consequences
  • Approach: Leonida (2022)
    • Features:
      • Maximizes fuel utilization
      • Minimizes trips to fuel locations
    • Lacking:
      • Math formulation
      • Multi-objective function
      • No proven results

3. Methodology


3.1. Data Collection

  • Data Retrieved from FMS
  • MF is the match factor

3.2. Machine Learning

  • Features & Labels:
    • Feature: EFH (m), truck model, payload (tons)
    • Label: Fuel consumed (L)
  • Machine learning algorithms: 6 supervised ML algorithms
  • Tuning: Grid search, cross-validation
  • Selection: Accuracy (R-squared), simplicity (tuning time)
  • Coding Environment: Python, Scikit-learn, Tensorflow

3.3. Optimization

  • Optimization model: Binary integer programming model
  • Objective Functions: Maximize match factor
  • Decision variables: If truck h is sent to fuel at time t
  • Constraints:
    • <20% fuel ratio trucks refueled
    • Trucks avoid simultaneous refueling
    • Trucks fueling only once
    • 15-minute refueling window
    • 0% minimum fuel level ensured
  • Coding Environment: Python & Gurobi

4. Results


4.1. Machine Learning

| Algorithm | R^2 (Test) | Training Time | Tuning Time | | — | — | — | — | | Multi-Linear Regression (Base Model) | 75% | 126ms | 0s | | Support Vector Regression (SVR) | 75% | 31ms | 5m 21s | | Decision Tree Regression | 55% | 107ms | 5m 25s | | Gradient Boosting Regression | 66% | 139ms | 3m 29s | | Random Forest Regression | 64% | 109ms | 1m 07s | | Artificial Neural Network | 90% | 65ms | 21hr 17min |


4.2. Optimization

  • First Formulation (Fuel time window):
    • (1) Infeasible model, (2) impractical to adjust truck-shovel allocations.
  • Adjustment First Formulation:
    • (1) Penalty for overlapping fueling, (2) non-linearity issue, and (3) variables and constraints = more time
  • Second Formulation (No fuel time window):
    • (1) Feasible (+optimal) model, (2) Match factor improvement (avg.): 1 point, and (3) arrival difference (avg.): 10-minute difference

5. Future work

  1. Investigating the impact of different variables;
  2. Extending the sample size;
  3. Implementation;
  4. Mobile stations in the optimization model;
  5. Model a complete shift with the truck-shovel allocation engine.

6. Code Source


Tags:
0 comments